Acton University 2017
Russell Moore heads the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission for the Southern Baptist Convention.
His after dinner keynote at Acton University hit the power chords on the issues of freedom of conscience in a free society.
What follows is a combination of brief notes and my observations/commentary.
Many secularists today encourage us to keep our beliefs out of the public marketplace of ideas. They have no place to put things like:
…being motivated by religious conscience…
We get the feeling that we have other motivations, such as some kind of power grab which they need to block.
We have two challenges before us:
- Internal. Helping religious-minded people understand why religious liberty matters. Is the state God? The final authority? What limits the state’s sovereignty? The first amendment starting with religious freedom shows a “priority of conscience” which limits the state.
- External. Helping secularists understand that freedom to believe is more than private thinking. It is a freedom to act in spiritually motivated ways. Helping secularists better understand spiritual motivation.
- Is “majoritarianism” the solution to everything? Winner takes all?
- Can those with exclusive truth claims exist with others? Of course, they tend to be the best at it because of clarity. Exclusivists (with deontological postulates) who believe in religious liberty don’t want to coerce others to believe what they believe. A coerced Christian message (or Gospel) is not a Gospel at all.
- Growing secularism forces us to self-define. This is a good thing. But we have to do the work of making it happen. Intellectual laziness comes easily.
- We don’t have more atheists today. We have more HONEST atheists.
- A majoritarian view of politics is a problem, secular OR religious.
- The temptation to use state coercion (force) to eliminate OR establish religion runs totally counter to our founding DNA in America. The founders clearly opposed both. De facto elimination (from the public square) of anything supernatural is an intellectual gutter ball. The tension (and there is indeed tension) must be held, and common sense must prevail in case-to-case situations.
- The state does not have the capacity or authority to referee between truth claims. Eliminating the Design Argument from classrooms is over-reaching.
- Advocacy for religious freedom is an offensive (literally) act. We can’t just play defense.
- Those of us who are religiously motivated need to claim the power to have honest discussions in the public square.
- The state does not settle every issue. No one believes that the state does NOT equal “highest truth.”
- A state that can pave over conscience can do anything.
- People with vague beliefs and no real church/God often over-identify personally with a political movement (right or left).
- We don’t want to be persecutors OR to be persecuted.
- There is something more important than Caesar. Caesar is not God.